러시아 푸틴이 2014년 크림반도를 러시아에 병합.
2018년, 러시아와 크림반도를 연결하는 19 km 케르치 다리 공사. 비용, 37억 달러.
케르치 다리 개통일, 푸틴이 트럭을 직접 몰고 다리를 건너는 시연을 할 정도로 전략적으로 중요.
폭발 원인, 폭발자는 아직 밝혀지지 않았지만, 러시아와 우크라이나 간의 새로운 전투 국면임을 보여줌.
케르치 대교 폭발은 푸틴의 크림반도 강제 병합에 저항하는 한 신호이기 때문에, 폭발 원인 규명도 중요하지만, 이미 정치적으로는 러시아 푸틴에 대한 강력한 반격인 셈이다.
----------------------
bbc 뉴스 보도 내용 일부.
폭발 원인 아직 불분명한 상태, 러시아는 우크라이나의 테러로 간주.
러시아 푸틴 입장. 케르치 대교 폭발은 테러 행위.
러시아 당국은 소셜 미디어의 동영상을 조사한 후, 크라스노다 지역 출신 25세 청년, 사미르 유수보프가 폭발물을 실은 트럭 주인으로 지목, 그의 친척 마키르 유수보프가 트럭 운전수.
그러나 동영상을 검증해보니 그 트럭은 폭발과 무관.
다른 가능성은 불법 해양 드론.
제 3의 가능성. 정체불명 보트가 등장.
Crimean bridge: Who - or what - caused the explosion?
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-63192757
Russia-Ukraine war
By Paul Adams
BBC News Kyiv, Ukraine
What do we know about what caused Saturday's dramatic explosion on the Kerch Bridge?
There are plenty of theories, not all of them very credible.
Russia was quick to suggest this was a truck (lorry) bomb, but didn't say who orchestrated it.
Russian President Vladimir Putin accused Ukraine of attacking the bridge in an "act of terrorism".
Security camera footage released on social media showed a truck - allegedly from the Russian city of Krasnodar, an hour's drive from the crossing - moving west across the bridge at the time of the explosion.
Russian officials named a 25-year old Krasnodar man, Samir Yusubov, as the owner of the truck, and said an older relative, Makhir Yusubov, was the driver.
But close examination of the footage seems to show that the truck had nothing to do with the explosion.
line
The footage shows a huge fireball erupting just behind - and to one side - of the truck as it begins to climb an elevated section of the bridge.
The speed with which the truck bomb theory started to spread in Russian circles was suspicious. It suggested the Kremlin preferred an act of terrorism to a more alarming possibility: that this was an audacious act of sabotage carried out by Ukraine.
"I've seen plenty of large vehicle-borne IEDs [improvised explosive devices] in my time," a former British army explosives expert told me. "This does not look like one."
A more plausible explanation, he said, is a massive explosion below the bridge - probably delivered using some kind of clandestine maritime drone.
"Bridges are generally designed to resist downwards loads on the deck and a certain amount of side loading from the wind," he said. "They are not generally engineered to resist upward loads. I think this fact was exploited in the Ukrainian attack."
Some observers have noted that in one of the other security camera videos, something that looks like the bow wave of a small boat appears next to one of the bridge supports, a split second before the explosion.
What kind of vessel could it be?
On 21 September, images circulated on Russian social media channels showing a mysterious unmanned boat that washed ashore near Russia's naval base in the Crimean city of Sevastopol.
It resembled a large black covered kayak, complete with bow-mounted sensors and a white, periscope-like device on top
According to local reports, the vessel was towed out to sea and blown up.
"A part of an unmanned vehicle was discovered," the governor of Russian-controlled Sevastopol is quoted as saying.
"After the survey was completed, this apparatus was destroyed at sea by an explosion. No-one was hurt."
This is not the first time reports have circulated suggesting that Ukraine has access to such clandestine equipment.
"There are well-founded reports which suggest that the Ukrainians have both surveillance and strike maritime remote controlled vehicles in service," the British explosives expert told me.
"This operational concept has been developed over years, not months."
If this is how Ukraine managed to attack the Kerch Bridge, hundreds of miles from Ukrainian-controlled territory, then it's one of Kyiv's most ambitious operations so far.
But apart from a few whispers in the capital, no-one is confirming the theory.
Media caption,
The $3.7bn (£2.7bn) bridge links southern Russia with the territory it annexed in 2014 (2018 report)
In fact, in a statement last night, the head of President Zelensky's office, Mykhailo Podolyak, seemed to endorse Moscow's truck bomb theory.
"The answers should be sought in Russia," he said in a statement.
The explosion, he said, was the result of infighting between different parts of Russia's security establishment.
"This is a concrete manifestation of the conflict between the FSB [Russia's internal intelligence service] / PMC [private military contractors, like the Wagner Group] on the one hand, and the Ministry of Defence / general staff of the Russian Federation on the other hand," he said.
Did Mr Podolyak know something everyone else didn't? Or was he, perhaps, trolling Moscow, playing on extremely raw nerves exposed by Russia's recent setbacks on the battlefield in Ukraine?
The truth is, we don't know.
Just like previous episodes - including the sinking of the flagship of Russia's Black Sea Fleet, the Moskva, and the mysterious attack in August which devastated a Russian airbase in Crimea - Kyiv is very happy to keep everyone guessing.
It's all part of a highly successful information campaign which Ukraine has waged, along with its military effort, ever since Russia's full-scale invasion in February.
For now, it seems to be working.
페트로 포로셴코, 우크라이나 대통령은 '케르치' 다리의 불법 건설은 러시아 푸틴이 국제법을 무시해버리는 가장 최근 증거라고 발표.
