2018.April 22 at 11:14pm ·
뉴욕 타임즈 제인 페레즈가 쓴 기사 핵심은, 중국은 민주적 통일 코리아, 혹은 친미적 통일 코리아를 원치 않는다. 현상유지를 바란다는 것이다. 그런데 제인 페레즈 기사는 아래와 같은 몇 가지 점에서 오류라고 난 생각한다.
1) 중국과 미국의 경제적 통상량과 과거 냉전시대 미소간 경제 통합 정도를 비교해보라. 아래 기사는 중국이 미국과 경쟁하는 방식과 냉전시기 미소간 적대적 경쟁을 구별하지 못했다.
중국은 남북한이 느슨하게 연방국가로 되어도 미국과 경쟁하는데 큰 불편을 느끼지 않을 것이다.
군사적인 패권 장소는 남지나 동지나 영토 분쟁지역이다. 그러나 여기 역시 과거 냉전시기와는 달리 미국과 중국이 타협책을 내놓을 가능성이 크다.
2) 제인 페레즈 기사는 중국 시진핑의 입장에 대해서 제대로 이해하지 못했다. 시진핑은 북미 갈등 해결책으로서 "북한은 핵을 버리고 미국은 경제제재 버려라"고 제안했다.
이것이 쌍궤병행, 즉 비핵화와 평화체제의 맞교환이다.
이를 위해, 쌍중단이 필요하다. 쌍중단이란 북한은 핵개발과 시험을 중단하고, 미국은 북한 겨냥 대규모 군사훈련 중단하는 것이다.
이 두가지가 중국 공식 입장이고 말장난이나 위장으로 해석할 필요는 없다.
3) 왜 북한 정부가 주한미군 철수 없이도 미국과 공식 수교를 맺을 수 있다고 봤는가 ? 당연히 북의 외교 전술이다. 북의 체제 보장이 우선이고, 북미수교, 북한 경제 특구 9곳 10곳에 미국 등 해외 투자를 하면, 주한 미군이 현재와 같이 주둔해도 된다는 것이다.
한국이나 북한 입장에서는 한반도와 동북아에서 또 환태평양, 동남아시아에서 미국이나 중국이 패권국가가 되는 것을 허용할 필요가 없다. 오히려 두 세력의 균형, 혹은 중소국가들의 연대가 더 낫다.
한국이나 북한이나 장기적으로는 미국 중국을 균등하게 대해야 한다.
.
BEIJING — As the North Korean leader, Kim Jong-un, prepares for his meetings with the presidents of South Korea and the United States, China has found itself in an unaccustomed place: watching from the sidelines.
Worse, many Chinese analysts say, North Korea could pursue a grand bargain designed not only to bring the isolated nation closer to its two former Korean War foes, but also diminish its reliance on China for trade and security.
Such an outcome — a reversal of 70 years of history — remains a long shot, amid doubts about whether the North would agree to relinquish its arsenal of nuclear weapons. Still, China finds itself removed from the center of the rapidly unfolding diplomacy, and unusually wary about Mr. Kim’s objectives in reaching out to his nation’s two bitterest enemies.
Mr. Kim’s meeting with the South Korean president, Moon Jae-in, is set for Friday, and a meeting with President Trump — the first ever between leaders of the two nations — is expected to follow in May or early June.
In a sign of just how much is suddenly on the table, South Korea recently confirmed that it was in talks with the North and with the United States about signing a treaty to end the Korean War, which halted in 1953, but never formally ended.
With events moving so quickly, and Beijing finding itself largely left on the outside, analysts said China and its leader, Xi Jinping, must at least consider what they called worst-case contingencies.
“The loss of prestige is a big problem for China and Xi, who wants everyone else to view China as an essential actor of international relations, especially in the Northeast Asian context,” said Zhang Baohui, a professor of international relations at Lingnan University in Hong Kong. “Now, suddenly, China is no longer relevant.”
[“We no longer need” nuclear or missile tests: Read about whether North Korea is really willing to trade away its arsenal for economic benefits.]
In a declaration over the weekend that North Korea would suspend nuclear and missile tests, Mr. Kim spoke as if the North was already a nuclear power, and no longer needed weapons tests, a direct challenge to the Trump administration’s stated goal of denuclearization. Washington has declared that the coming negotiations are about getting rid of the arsenal.
Still, Mr. Trump apparently wants to claim a place in history as the American leader who formally ended the Korean War — even though he tweeted on Sunday morning that he was not rushing into a deal. And Mr. Moon is eager to edge toward the reunification of the two Koreas. So China fears the outcome could be either a North Korea or a unified Korean Peninsula leaning toward the United States.
Since the 1950-53 Korean War, when China fought on the side of the North against the United States and its ally in the South, the alliances have been immovable. The North has provided a convenient buffer for China against having American troops on its border; the South serves as a base in the region for the American military.
In negotiations over the denuclearization of the North, Beijing has to worry whether all that could suddenly be in play, Chinese analysts said.
“If a grand deal can be struck between Kim and Trump, in the form of denuclearization in exchange for normalization of bilateral relations, then Northeast Asia may see a major realignment,” Mr. Zhang said. “China does not run Kim’s foreign policy and they know that.”
The possible new alignment on the Korean Peninsula that most concerns Beijing is a loose unification between North and South Korea with American troops remaining in the South.
As part of its conciliatory moves before the meetings, the North has dropped its demand for the departure of the 28,000 United States troops stationed in the South as a condition for denuclearization.
“A unified, democratic Korea aligned with the U.S. will be dangerous to the Communist regime in China, though not necessarily the Chinese nation,” said Xia Yafeng, a North Korea expert at Long Island University.
From China’s point of view, a favorable outcome from the meeting between Mr. Trump and Mr. Kim may simply be a less dangerous version of the status quo, Mr. Xia said.
There could be a “nice photo” of the two men, with vague promises from the North Korean leader to get rid of his nuclear weapons, and then long negotiations in which China would have a big say, he said.
What is curious is that China has for decades spoken in favor of a peace treaty to end the Korean War. Premier Zhou Enlai of China mentioned ending the Korean War in a 1971 interview with The New York Times columnist James Reston, Mr. Xia said.
China, however, has a very specific view of what such a treaty would entail: the withdrawal of American troops from South Korea, which would leave both Koreas leaning toward China.
“A peace treaty is good for China in that it will presumably denuclearize North Korea, and more important, it will end the legality of the U.S. military alliance and troop presence on the peninsula,” said Yun Sun, a North Korea expert at the Stimson Center in Washington.
Since North Korea is looking for security guarantees from the United States in return for denuclearization, that guarantee “will hopefully include the withdrawal of U.S. troops,” she said.
But, like his grandfather and father, who ruled North Korea before him, Mr. Kim has shown signs of wanting to reduce China’s influence.
When the young leader made a surprise visit to Beijing three weeks ago to meet Mr. Xi for the first time, the two men seemed to repair somewhat the traditionally close relationship between the two countries that had been in the freezer since Mr. Kim came to power in 2011.
In fact, the visit was probably not so much a gesture of rapprochement as a deft move by Mr. Kim to play China against the United States, just as his grandfather had maneuvered between China and the Soviet Union, Chinese analysts said.
Mr. Kim’s purpose was to give the impression to the Americans that he was entering the meetings with China at his back, they said. Mr. Xi accepted an invitation from Mr. Kim to make a return visit to Pyongyang, but there were no signs that would happen before Mr. Trump meets with Mr. Kim, a Chinese government spokesman said.
Analysts say that since coming to power, the young Mr. Kim has resented his country’s almost total economic dependence on Beijing, which has only increased under the tough United Nations economic sanctions that China voted for last year.
About 90 percent of the North’s foreign trade in essential items — coal, minerals, seafood, textiles — passes through China, and China is its biggest supplier of fuel.
At the urging of the Trump administration, China approved the sanctions that have severely cut the North’s access to fuel and hard currency. North Korean ties with China seemed to hit a low, with Mr. Kim refusing to even meet a Chinese envoy in November, and conducting a ballistic missile test instead.
Perhaps wary of alienating the North, and unhappy with Mr. Trump’s decision to impose tariffs on Chinese imports, Beijing was no longer so willing to punish the North, Chinese analysts said.
There are already signs that trade is picking up along China’s border with North Korea, Chinese traders say, which could mean a relaxing after six months of near total trade embargo.
Hours after the North’s announcement on Saturday of its suspension of nuclear tests, one outspoken Chinese state-run newspaper, The Global Times, said the United Nations should “immediately discuss the cancellation of part of the sanctions against North Korea.”
Further, the United States, South Korea and Japan should lift their unilateral sanctions against the North, the paper said.
A picture caption with an earlier version of this article misspelled the given name of the Chinese president. He is Xi Jinping, not Xi Jingping.
'한국정치 > 북한_DPRK' 카테고리의 다른 글
| From Benjamin in the DMZ, Kim and Moon make their first remarks (0) | 2018.04.27 |
|---|---|
| 문재인과 김정은의 월경 놀이 - 김정은 문재인 군사분계선 넘나들다 (0) | 2018.04.27 |
| 국무장관 마이크 폼페오와 김정은 노동위원장이 평양에서 만났다 (0) | 2018.04.27 |
| 미국 여론, 민주당 지지자들이 보이는 북한에 대한 태도 (0) | 2018.04.25 |
| 김정은 노선, 조선노동당 중앙위 연설문 (4월 21일) 평가, 지식경제 어떻게 가능한가? (0) | 2018.04.25 |
| 김대중 조선일보 사설, 주한미군 철수마오 ~ 공포의식 버려라 (0) | 2018.04.25 |
| 북한 빈부격차, 특히 평양 대 비평양 지역 간 경제 문화 소비력 불평등 문제 (0) | 2018.04.25 |
